https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32834 Wed 19 Jan 2022 15:17:36 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51025 Wed 16 Aug 2023 10:02:34 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:46698 Wed 13 Mar 2024 08:07:19 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:19681 Wed 11 Apr 2018 14:42:48 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:30808 Wed 11 Apr 2018 12:31:21 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:15136 Wed 11 Apr 2018 09:13:41 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:33370 Wed 09 Feb 2022 15:55:29 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:48997 35 cigarettes/day. Lung cancer risk was lower with quitting at any age but remained higher than never-smokers for quitters aged >25y. By age 80y, an estimated 48.3% of current-smokers (41.1% never-smokers) will develop cancer, and 14% will develop lung cancer, including 7.7% currently smoking 1-5 cigarettes/day and 26.4% for >35 cigarettes/day (1.0% never-smokers). Cancer risk for Australian smokers is significant, even for 'light' smokers. These contemporary estimates underpin the need for continued investment in strategies to prevent smoking uptake and facilitate cessation, which remain key to reducing cancer morbidity and mortality worldwide.]]> Wed 03 May 2023 12:03:16 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:33342 Thu 28 Oct 2021 13:04:32 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45346 Thu 27 Oct 2022 10:29:08 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:36717 Thu 09 Dec 2021 11:03:35 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:35014 Thu 09 Dec 2021 11:01:40 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:51488 Thu 07 Sep 2023 10:52:02 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:33626 Thu 03 Feb 2022 12:22:13 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:21369 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:51:25 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:28048 Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:41:01 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:41232 P < 0.001). Conclusion: Only 30% of patients with high-risk features are referred to a radiation oncologist with the likelihood of referral being influenced by the perceived risk of cancer-recurrence as well as the urologist’s institutional/personal preference. When patients are seen by a radiation oncologist, 61% receive radiotherapy within 6 months after RP with the likelihood of receiving radiotherapy not being heavily influenced by increasing risk of recurrence. This suggests many suitable patients would receive radiotherapy if referred and seen by a radiation oncologist.]]> Fri 29 Jul 2022 13:51:38 AEST ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:44096 p < 0.001). After adjustment, there was no significant difference in referral to radiation oncology (intervention 32% vs control 30%; adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI [0.74 to 1.51]; p=0.879). Sites with the largest relative increases in the percentage of patients discussed also tended to have greater increases in referral (p=0.001). In the intervention phase, urologists failed to provide referrals to more than half of patients whom the MDT had recommended for referral (78 of 140; 56%). Conclusions: The intervention resulted in significantly more patients being discussed by a MDT. However, the recommendations from MDTs were not uniformly recorded or followed. Although practice varied markedly between MDTs, the intervention did not result in a significant overall change in referral rates, probably reflecting a lack of change in urologists' attitudes. Our results suggest that interventions focused on structures and processes that enable health system-level change, rather than those focused on individual-level change, are likely to have the greatest effect.]]> Fri 07 Oct 2022 08:50:21 AEDT ]]>